HOME | Contact Us

Current Issue

Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering - Vol. 15 , No. 3

[ Architectural/Urban Planning and Design ]
Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering - Vol. 15, No. 3, pp.471-478
ISSN: 1346-7581 (Print) 1347-2852 (Online)
Print publication date 30 Sep 2016
Received 08 Oct 2015 Accepted 11 Jul 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.15.471

Physical Activity and the Built Environment in Residential Neighborhoods of Seoul and Seattle: An Empirical Study Based on Housewives' GPS Walking Data and Travel Diaries
Sohyun Park*, 1 ; Yeemyung Choi2 ; Hanlim Seo3 ; Anne Vernez Moudon4 ; C.-H. Christine Bae5 ; So-Ra Baek6
1Professor, Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
2Researcher, R&DB Foundation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
3General Manager, Office for Civic Solutions, Seoul, Korea
4Professor, Department of Urban Design and Planning, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
5Associate Professor, Department of Urban Design and Planning, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
6Assistant Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, USA

Correspondence to : *Sohyun Park, Ph.D., Professor, Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea #532, Bldg. 39, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 151-744, South Korea Tel: +82-2-880-9256 Fax: +82-2-871-5518 E-mail: sohyunp@snu.ac.kr

Funding Information ▼


This paper is based on a collaborative pilot-study to ascertain the characteristic walking patterns and neighborhood features in residential areas of Seoul, Korea and Seattle, USA. As for sample sites, four case neighborhoods were selected: two from Seoul and two from in and outside of the Seattle-Shoreline areas. As for participants, thirty Korean housewives in Seoul and thirty Korean-American housewives in the Seattle area were selected respectively, and their socio-demographic characteristics, GPS records, and travel diary data for seven days were collected and analyzed. Considering the typical rainy seasons in the two cities, data collections, including the physical activity assessment by GPS devices, were carried out from May to June and from September to October in Seoul, and from July to October in Seattle during the year 2010.

Noteworthy research findings include the following: Korean participants in Seoul walk about 2.6 km on average per day, while Korean-American participants in Seattle walk about 400m on average per day. In the case sites of Seoul, 75% of grocery shopping activities happen within the neighborhood by walking, while only 17% of those activities on foot happen in the case sites of Seattle. As for the most walking activity, about 70% of total walking amounts are related to utilitarian walking in Seoul sites, while 50% of total walking are related to recreational walking in Seattle sites. Recreational walking and utilitarian walking occur separately in Seattle sites, while the two walking types are often combined in Seoul sites, which also contribute to more walking amounts and farther walking distances in Seoul sites.

This paper empirically confirms the widely held assumptions in part that residents in Seoul, a relatively high-density and high mixed-use city, walk more than those in Seattle, a relatively low-density and low mixed-use city. This paper also recognizes that in the case of both cities, more walking activities occur in the neighborhood built environment, where finely-grained street networks, small lots and blocks, various pedestrian destinations, public transit access, etc are provided in close connection. The amount and frequency of walking activities, as well as the fineness of neighborhood features, however, are remarkably different in the two cities, whose implications deserve in-depth exploration in further studies.

Keywords: physical activity, neighborhood environment, objective measures, GPS walking data, international comparative study

1. Craig, C.L., Brownson, R.C., Cragg, S.E., & Dunn, A.L. (2002) Exploring the effect of the environment on physical activity: A study examining walking to work. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2), pp.36-43.
2. Craig, C.L., Marshall, A.L., Sjostrom, M., Bauman, A.E., Booth, M.L., Ainsworth, BE., et al. (2003) International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 35, pp.1381-1395.
3. Cervero, R. & Kockelman, K. (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D, 2, pp.199-219.
4. Frank, L., Engelke, P., & Schmid, T. (2005) Health and Community Design: The Impact of the Built Environment on Physical activity. Washington: Island Press.
5. Handy, S. (1996) Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transportation Research Part D, 1, pp.151-165.
6. Handy, S., Cao, X. & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2006) Does self selection explain the relationship between built environment and walking behavior? Empirical evidence from Northern California. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, pp.55-74.
7. Hoehner, C., Laura K. Ramirez, L.B., Elliiot, M. B., Handy, S. L.,& Brownson, R. C. (2005) Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, pp.105-116.
8. Koohsari, M, J., Badland, H., & Giles-Corti, B. (2013) (RE)Designing the built environment to support physical activity: Bring public health into urban design and planning. Cities, 35, pp.294-298.
9. Lee, C., & Moudon, A. V. (2006) Correlates of Walking for Transportation or Recreation Purposes. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 3, S77-S98.
10. Lovasi, G. S., Moudon, A. V., Pearson , A. L., Hurvitz, P. M., Larson, E. B., Siscovick, D. S., Berke, E. M., Lumley, T., & Bruce M. P. (2008) Using built environment characteristics to predict walking for exercise. International Journal of Health Geographics 7:10.
11. Owen, N., Humpel, N., Leslie, E., Bauman, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2004) Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27, pp.67-76.
12. Park, S., Bae, C., Choi, Y., Seo, H., Moudon, A. V., & Baek, S. (2011) A Comparative Study of Physical Activity and the Built Environment between Seoul and Seattle. Seoul, Korea & Seattle, USA.
13. Rodríguez, D. A., Khattak, A. J., & Evenson, K. R. (2007) Can New Urbanism Encourage Physical Activity?: Comparing a New Urbanist Neighborhood with Conventional Suburbs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, pp.43-54.
14. Saelens, B. E., & Handy, S. L. (2008) Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 40.
15. Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., Black, J. B., & Chen, D. (2003a) Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. American Journal of Public Health, 93, pp.1552-1558.
16. Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., & Frank, L. D. (2003b) Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25, pp.80-91.
17. Troped, P. J., Oliveira, M. S., Mathews, C. E., & Cromley, E. K. (2008) Prediction of activity mode with global positioning system and accelerometer data. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40, pp.972-978.
18. Wieche, S. E., Carroll, A. E., Liu, G. C., Haberkorn, K. L., Hoch, S. C., Wilson, J. S., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2008) Using GPS-enabled cell phones to track the travel patterns of adolescents. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7:22.