HOME | Contact Us

Current Issue

Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering - Vol. 15 , No. 3

[ Architectural/Urban Planning and Design ]
Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering - Vol. 15, No. 3, pp.463-470
ISSN: 1346-7581 (Print) 1347-2852 (Online)
Print publication date 30 Sep 2016
Received 05 Oct 2015 Accepted 11 Jul 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.15.463

Pedestrian Path Choice with Diagonal Streets
Byungsuk Kim1 ; Minkyun Kim2 ; Jiah Lee1 ; Jina Park*, 3
1Ph.D. Student, Department of Urban Planning, Hanyang University, Korea
2Master Student, Department of Urban Planning, Hanyang University, Korea
3Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Hanyang University, Korea

Correspondence to : *Jina Park, Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea Tel: +82-2-2220-0332 E-mail: paran42@hanyang.ac.kr

Funding Information ▼


The aim of this study is to investigate pedestrian path choice between diagonal and straight streets. We selected 16 streets including both straight and diagonal streets in Seoul for this study. We then investigated the environments and structures of these streets and surveyed pedestrians about which streets they would choose when they had no destination. First, the participants tend to choose diagonal streets. Second, street angle and street width were identified as the structural factors that had the strongest effects on path choice among diagonal streets. Some environmental factors were also found to be significant: presence of sidewalk, road pavement type, commercial use, presence of street trees, and use of the acute angle plot at an intersection. Overall, the results indicated that some structural and environmental factors associated with diagonal streets affected the pedestrian path choice.

Keywords: path choice, street structure, pedestrian, diagonal street, walking

1. Agrawal et al. (2008) How far, by which route and why? A spatial analysis of pedestrian preference. Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), pp.81-98.
2. Blanco et al. (2009) Hot, congested, crowded and diverse: Emerging research agendas in planning. Progress in Planning, 71(4), pp.153-205.
3. Borgers, A. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (2005) Modelling pedestrian behaviour in downtown shopping areas. In 10th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, London, United Kingdom.
4. Choi, M. and Hyun, T. (2010) Analysis of Factors affecting Satisfaction of Street-scape - Focused on the Street of Central Market, Pohang City. Journal of the Korean Institute of Rural Architecture, 12(1), pp.1-8.
5. Choi, I. (2003) A Study on the formation of building for urban streetscape improvement, MS. Dissertation, Graduate School of Urban Studies Hanyang University, Seoul.
6. Cullen, G. (1971) The concise townscape. Burlington: Architectural Press.
7. Guo, Z. (2009) Does the pedestrian environment affect the utility of walking? A case of path choice in downtown Boston. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(5), pp.343-352.
8. Guo, Z. and Ferreira, J. (2008) Pedestrian environments, transit path choice, and transfer penalties: understanding land-use impacts on transit travel. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design, 35(3), p.461.
9. Guo, Z. and Loo, B. P. (2013) Pedestrian environment and route choice: evidence from New York City and Hong Kong. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, pp.124-136.
10. Kawada et al. (2014) Street Choice Logit Model for Visitors in Shopping Districts. Behavioral Sciences, 4(3), pp.154-166.
11. Kim et al. (2014) Meso- or micro-scale? Environmental factors influencing pedestrian satisfaction. Transportation Research Part D, 30(-), pp.10-20.
12. Lee et al. (2014) A Study on the Impact Factors of Pedestrian Path Choice on Intersections. Journal of The Urban Design Institute of Korea, 15(4): 165-174.
13. Leyden, K. M. (2003) Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), pp.1546-1551.
14. Lim, S. (2007) "Environmental psychology and human behavior: human-friendly environment design", Seoul: Bomoondang.
15. Rodriguez, et al. (2014) Influence of the built environment on pedestrian route choices of adolescent girls. Environment and Behavior, 0013916513520004, pp.1-36.
16. Seneviratne, P. N. and Morrall, J. F. (1985) Analysis of factors affecting the choice of route of pedestrians. Transportation Planning and Technology, 10(2), pp.147-159.
17. Song et al. (2014) A Study on structure environment of streets and preference of pedestrians. Journal of The Urban Design Institute of Korea, 15(3): 151-161.
18. Zacharias, J. (2001) Path choice and visual stimuli: signs of human activity and architecture. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), pp.341-352.